Mel Gibson’s Controversial Take on the Los Angeles Wildfires
Actor Mel Gibson, famous for his roles in movies like Mad Max, has stirred up quite a bit of attention and controversy with his recent comments about the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles. His perspective has left many people scratching their heads and asking, “What is he really saying?”
The wildfires, which caused massive destruction, hit close to home for Gibson—literally. The actor lost his own Malibu home, worth a staggering £12 million, to the fires. But instead of focusing on the tragedy, Gibson’s reaction raised eyebrows. Instead of simply mourning his loss, he shared a theory that shocked many.
“I can dream up all kinds of terrible scenarios in my mind—conspiracy theories and the like—but it just felt a bit too convenient that there was no water,” Gibson told reporters.
He went on to suggest that the wind conditions were perfect for spreading the fire, and that there were people out there, “ready, willing, and capable of starting fires.” He even went as far as to speculate that the fires might have been intentionally started to clear land for development.
After news spread that a suspect had been arrested in connection with one of the fires, Gibson didn’t back down from his theory. Instead, he asked, “Was this person working alone, or were they commissioned to do this?” This question raised even more eyebrows, as many wondered what he was suggesting.
In a more detailed interview on Fox News with Laura Ingraham, Gibson expanded on his thoughts. “Some of these people they’re catching seem to be very well-prepared,” he said. Gibson didn’t stop there, continuing to hint that there was more to the story.
“I’m aware that they’ve been interfering with water supplies, releasing reserves for various reasons,” he added. “They’ve been doing this for some time. California has numerous issues that are difficult to understand when it comes to decision-making.”
The actor then delved deeper into his suspicions, questioning whether the fires could have been planned. “When events like this happen, you start to wonder—was it intentional? It’s a crazy thought, but it makes you question whether there’s a purpose behind it,” Gibson admitted. “If there is, what could that purpose be? Do they want the state emptied out? I don’t know.”
“They seem highly equipped, these individuals who are being apprehended,” Gibson repeated, emphasizing his belief that there was something organized behind the fires. His words quickly spread across the media, sparking intense debate.
Social media was flooded with reactions, most of them sharply critical. “Conspiracy theories seem to be his last attempt at relevance,” one Twitter user wrote, voicing their frustration.
“Is it on purpose?” Mel Gibson goes on Fox News to spread conspiracy theories about the Los Angeles wildfires. (Video: Fox News) pic.twitter.com/Vmljb7rTQ1
— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) January 11, 2025
Another user added, “While Californians are battling fires, these two are busy stirring the pot,” referring to both Gibson and Ingraham’s comments. A third user simply said, “Shameful.”
But the debate didn’t stop there. Laura Ingraham, who was hosting Gibson during the interview, also added her thoughts on the situation. She pointed out that there had been prior speculation about plans for high-density housing developments in the areas affected by the wildfires.
Some people even suggested that the fires might have been a way to clear valuable land for these future developments. Gibson made an analogy to the past, likening the situation to “old cattle barons driving people off the land,” a reference to a time when landowners used harsh tactics to push people off valuable land.
Gibson’s theory, which connects the wildfires to larger conspiracy ideas about land development and water management, has divided public opinion. Some people agree with his suspicions, suggesting that something more might be behind the devastation.
Others are critical, saying that these ideas are simply wild theories with no solid evidence.
What do you think of Mel Gibson’s perspective on the wildfires? Is he onto something, or is it just another conspiracy theory? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
